The Philippine-American War And Iraq II


The Philippine-American War (1899-1902) is not often discussed. It seems to be a matter of much shame in America. There are a number of surprising similarities to the Second Iraq war that are tell us how ashamed we will be after this current war is over.

The following is an extract of a Wikipedia article describing the similarities between the two wars.

President McKinley claimed that God told him to take over the Philippines. Civilians were rounded up, tortured by what would today be called "water boarding" and other methods, and murdered. Any malea over the age of 10 years was considered to be capable of bearing arms, and could be, and frequently were summarily executed. Civilians were killed for "sport". The upper eschelons of the military and civilian government decided that the conventional rules of war at that time did not apply. And of course, any who criticized the war were labeled as traitors.

President McKinley is reputed to have said that God gave him guidance on the necessity of taking over the Philippines by force. "...that there was nothing left for us to do but to take them all, and to educate the Filipinos, and uplift and civilize and Christianize them, and by God’s grace do the very best we could by them, as our fellow-men for whom Christ also died.

The military is said to have killed as many as one million civilians, including those down to the age of ten years.

"I want no prisoners. I wish you to kill and burn, the more you kill and burn the better it will please me. I want all persons killed who are capable of bearing arms in actual hostilities against the United States.” General Jacob H. Smith said.

"It may be necessary to kill half the Filipinos in order that the remaining half of the population may be advanced to a higher plane of life than their present semi-barbarous state affords."--General William Shafter

"The present war is no bloodless, fake, opera bouffe engagement; our men have been relentless, have killed to exterminate men, women, children, prisoners and captives, active insurgents and suspected people from lads of ten up, the idea prevailing that the Filipino as such was little better than a dog, a noisome reptile in some instances, whose best disposition was to the rubbish heap. Our soldiers have pumped salt water into men to make them talk, and have taken prisoners people who held up their hands and peacefully surrendered, and an hour later, without an atom of evidence to show that they were even insurrectors, stood them on a bridge and shot them down one by one, to drop into the water below and float down, as examples to those who found their bullet-loaded corpses. It is not civilized warfare, but we are not dealing with civilized people. The only thing they know and fear is force, violence, and brutality, and we give it to them."--A reporter for the Philadelphia Ledger, Nov. 19, 1900 Later in the article he stipulated that such tactics were necessary and long overdue.

"A company of Macabebes enter a town or barrio, catch some man, -- it matters not whom, -- ask him if he knows where there are any guns, and, upon receiving a negative answer, five or six of them throw him down, one holds his head, while others have hold of an arm or a leg. They then proceed to give him the "water torture," which is the distension of the internal organs with water. After they are distended, a cord is sometimes placed around the body and the water expelled. From what I have heard, it appears to be generally applied; and its use is not confined to our section. Although it results in the finding of a number of guns, it does us an infinite amount of harm. Nor are the Macabebes the only ones who use this method of obtaining information. Personally, I have never seen this torture inflicted, nor have I ever knowingly allowed it; but I have seen a victim a few minutes afterward, with his mouth bleeding where it had been cut by a bayonet used to hold the mouth open, and his face bruised where he had been struck by the Macabebes. Add to this the expression of his face and his evident weakness from the torture, and you have a picture which once seen will not be forgotten. I am not chickenhearted, but this policy hurts us. Summary executions are, and will be, necessary in a troubled country, and I have no objection to seeing that they are carried out; but I am not used to torture. The Spaniards used the torture of water, throughout the islands, as a means of obtaining information; but they used it sparingly, and only when it appeared evident that the victim was culpable. Americans seldom do things by halves. We come here and announce our intention of freeing the people from three or four hundred years of oppression, and say, "We are strong, and powerful, and grand." Then to resort to inquisitorial methods, and use them without discrimination, is unworthy of us, and will recoil on us as a nation."--George Kennan

"There is no question that our men do 'shoot niggers' somewhat in the sporting spirit, but that is because war and their environments have rubbed off the thin veneer of civilization...Undoubtedly, they do not regard the shooting of Filipinos just as they would the shooting of white troops. This is partly because they are "only niggers," and partly because they despise them for their treacherous servility...The soldiers feel they are fighting with savages, not with soldiers."--H.L. Wells New York Evening Post.

Since guerrilla warfare was contrary to "the customs and usages of war," those engaged in it "divest themselves of the character of soldiers, and if captured are not entitled to the privileges of prisoners of war."--General Arthur MacArthur, December 20, 1900

This is fucking awesome...

A unique, salient, and bone chilling thing to contrast the present day with m. It deserves more attention.

I'm ashamed to say I didn't actually know about the Philippine-American War myself.

Not yet rated.

Not always called the Philipine-American War

Its a part of the Spanish-American war. You are so right when you say that the parallels are chilling.

We seem to learn nothing, caught in an endless loop. The enemy is so evil that we can't follow the "rules" of war. Torture is permitted. Civilians are slaughtered. Murder becomes a "sport". All because this war is unique.

Not yet rated.

Aha.

I have heard of that one. Weren't there two, actually? I thought the whole assassination thing in Spain is what started WWI.

Not yet rated.

The War to End All Wars

Was precipitated by the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand and his wife in 1914 in Sarajevo.

And, these deaths might have been worth it had that war been true to its name, but when WWII came along they just had to change the appellation.

Not yet rated.

Eh - Sarajevo, Spain

...same thing, right? ;-)

(slinks away in discrace)

Not yet rated.

Spanish American War

was created by pretext of blowing up "the Maine" in Cuba by our own saboteurs so we could provoke a war with Spain, by then a weakened colonial non-power, and we saw colonies ripe for the picking. Think the Caribbean, Philippines, Central America, others which we took from Spain as "spoils of war." We did it out of pure colonial imperialism, leaving Europe to fight over Africa and Asia which eventually boiled over into WWI, due to the colonial "have-nots" (Germany, Ottomans, etc.) wanting to take on the "haves." (UK, France, etc.) What we did to Spain is somewhat similar to what we did to Saddam. Both aging, both toothless, both seemed to further our ends. Of course, the karmic kreemer is that McKinley was assassinated not long afterwards, and Teddy R., hero of "the rough riders" and San Juan Hill and all that nonsense, took over.

"If not here, where? If not now, when?"

Not yet rated.

Show off. ;-)

n/t

Not yet rated.

Well we haven't always been for truth

justice and the American way. Well maybe the American way. It's just the imperialists are harder to eradicate than cockroaches. Smirky McPretzel doesn't understand what a tool he really is.

"If not here, where? If not now, when?"

Not yet rated.

Noooooh

The only important thing is that there is no War to End All Wars. They are just a cycle of violence. Peace is the end to war.

Not yet rated.

Coincidence?

This post and its comment thread reminded me of something I had read last year by Mark Twain. And I thought it, too, was chilling for the parallels:
http://www.libertystory.net/LSDOCTWAINWARPRAYER.htm

The coincidence is that he wrote it because he was so "outraged by American military intervention in the Phillipines," which I had forgotten.

When I first found it included a link to "War is a Racket," by Smedley Darlington Butler: http://lexrex.com/enlightened/articles/warisaracket.htm

Not yet rated.

The War Prayer

was posted a few months ago by our own Hella Troi, ever the agitator. ;-) Here's the link to the brilliant piece by Sam Clemens, a.k.a. Mark Twain. Will check out the Butler link. And in a final piece of trivia, "Mark Twain" originally meant "two fathoms depth" and Sam Clemens was a relative of George Clemens, the director of photography for "The Twilight Zone" tv series.

"If not here, where? If not now, when?"

Not yet rated.

War is a racket

is amazing. Truly amazing. Bravo, Karen. It's unbelievable that such a "war hero" would have written such a thing back when jingoism was so popular. Oh! But I forgot. It still is. We are truly screwed. Or at least the believers in war are. "Ask not for whom the bell tolls. It tolls for thee."

"If not here, where? If not now, when?"

Not yet rated.

Is downturn toward catastrophe unstoppable?

It increasingly appears so.

Not yet rated.

This wheel turns

and though there will be wreckage on a mass scale in the future, what's left will be better than what we have now, which is a reign of warmongering despots with small minds and smaller hearts. Eventually the people tire of war. Then their "leaders" follow.

"If not here, where? If not now, when?"

Not yet rated.

It's about time more Americans see the truth.....

Well I have been saying this well before we elected this man. I even wrote a song in Filipino. I called it "Isang Daang Taon" it means "100 Years". You can hear it on this music site. www.soundclick.com/nathanielsavellaramirez . It was inspired by the Philippine-American War. The Filipino version is addressed to the Filipino people. There is an English translation of the Filipino version on the site.

I also wrote an English version for my Fellow Americans. They were both written in Feb. 2000 when I was still serving in the U.S. Navy in Diego Garcia.

Ever since then I have dedicated every minute of my free time to telling the story of the Philippine-American War. For six years now I have been doing that. Which some of my Navy superiors did not like. So I got out a few months after the Iraq War II begun.

Now, I realize the urgency and importance that all Americans learn about the Philippine-American War. So I am organizing a non-profit foundation to help in that effort.

It will be called the Philippine-American War Memorial Foundation. Its mission is to memorialize the Philippine-American War as an object lesson to the world.

If you are interested in helping in any way, let me know. I am in the process of designing a website for the foundation. So far I have been spending my own money for research and pre-organization paperwork.

If you think what I am doing is worthwhile. Show your support monetarily or otherwise. Send me an e-mail, buy a copy of the song and make a donation to your favorite non-profit. Then talk to your family, your neighbors and friends about the Philippine-American War and what we did to the Filipino people.

Maybe the third time is the charm. Hopefully, this time we will all learn our lesson and make sure it will never happen again. Like the Vietnam Generation did but failed to keep.

Let us not forget that lesson we learned from that conflict. "We can disagree with the War but never blame the troops." Most of them are kids who do not know any better. In other words "Gung-Ho". I should know I have served with them.

Nathaniel Savella Ramirez
www.soundclick.com/nathanielsavellaramirez

Not yet rated.

We're doing what we can here

to get the word out! Most 'Merikans don't know jack about that war, which was why I thought it great that m posted what he did. Bravo on your efforts. Even your comment here will pick up some notice, and I suggest that you may want to create a diary here and post some pieces from time to time, since that will attract search engine notice. If you do some cross-posts at your future site and here, i.e., post the same article there and here, over time your own site will attain a much higher visibility. You may even find a financial angel somewhere who can fund your efforts! In any case, good luck with your project. And I will check out your site soon.

"If not here, where? If not now, when?"

Not yet rated.

sydney Riely

"All wars start in the boardrooms of Banks"

Not yet rated.

Wish you had researched before writing

The quote by Army General Smith Marine Corps Major Littleton W.T. Waller to explain what Smith wanted Waller's Marines to do, was made came after the massacre of 48 US soldiers of C Company, 9th Infantry in the town of Balangiga in September 1901. Smith was sent to the island of Samar to defeat one of the last strongholds of the Filipino Insurrectionists. By this point in the war self declared Filipino President Aquinaldo had been captured and had publicly urged an end to the fighting. General Smith's tactics did not work and he was relieved of command and forced out of the Army.

None of the replies mention the atrocities of the Filipinos against those that cooperated with the Americans. Murder of Filipinos working with Americans, torture of prisoners, arson of homes, etc. War is never a one sided affair.

If you are interested in the Philippine War I recommend
"Little Brown Brother" by Leon Wolff (A Philippine friendly book)
"Schoolbooks and Krags" by John M. Gates (An American friendly book)
"The Philippine War 1899-1902" by Brian M. Linn (A balanced look at the war)

Not yet rated.

Atrocities

As laughingcat points out below, one atrocity does not justify another. War is the atrocity.

The point of this writing was not to vilify the behavior of the American side during the Philippine war, but rather to compare the thought processes and practices that remain the same from one war to another. I could have picked any force in any war. The enemy is always seen as subhuman, and oxymoronicaly both an incompetent, and a cunning beyond belief fighter. This is necessary to free raw soldiers of their inhibitions towards killing, and to gain popular support for the war. "This enemy is so horrible that they can not understand anything but force." The quotes from the Phillipine war could have been spoken today.

These stories and claims are ubiquitous. Like the claims of the 16 year old daughter of the Kuwaiti ambassador to the US, who swore to Congress that she saw Iraqi soldiers pulling Kuwaiti preemies from their incubators. That she had not been in Kuwait during the invasion mattered not. No different than the claims of German soldiers lofting Belgian babies, and catching them on bayonnet. The horror stories are not true in the beginning, but they become true by the end for both sides.

There is no possible justification for the US to deny the applicability of the Geneva conventions to the combatants in Iraq and Afghanistan. There is no purpose in the US having literally purchased people from thugs who kidnapped anyone they could find in Iraq and Afghanistan, then transporting these unfortunates to Gitmo for imprisonment and torture.

It is one thing for atrocities to occur. It is another for them to become the policy and practice of a nation. We have returned to the institutionalization of torture. The approval trail leads to the top. This is a barbaric regression that we, along with the rest of the world will suffer. What we do to others, by will and law, we will do to ourselves next.

Not yet rated.

Are you implying

that if one side eats babies, the other side has a right to do so as well? Or that if one side eats babies, the other side gets to drop napalm? Just what point are you making? (ps - I'm SURE "his tactics did not work and he was relieved of command.") He sounds like Homer Simpson's great grandfather.

"If not here, where? If not now, when?"

Not yet rated.
Powered by Bloggyland